THE AMERICAN JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT, AN INADEQUATE AND FAILED EXPERIMENT.

AFTER A LONG TEN YEAR SPAN 2001-2012 OF VARIOUS TYPE COURT CASES IN STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS AND EXTERNAL SUPPORTING EVIDENCES, J2J HAS BUILT AND MADE ITS CASE AGAINST THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT IN THE U.S.A.

NOTICE HOW JUDGES NEVER, STRANGELY, SEEM TO COMMIT ANY CRIMES. YET, OTHER GOVERNMENTAL FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL OFFICERS ARE REASONABLY INVESTIGATED OR PROSECUTED AT SOME POINT. THIS IS NOT SO WITH THE JUDICIARY. TO SAY NO CRIMES CAN BE OR TRULY ARE NOT POSSIBLE BY JUDICIAL OFFICERS, BUT SAY BRIBERY, IS CLEARLY NAIVE, BIAS OR PURE IGNORANCE OF HOW THE SYSTEM RUNS IN THAT GOVERNMENTAL BRANCH, TO SAY THE LEAST.  

              LACK OF ORDER IN THE JUDICIARY          

PRESENTLY THERE IS NO VALID OR ADEQUATE ORDER IN THE JUDICIAL BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT LEAVING THE PEOPLE IN CONFUSION, CHAOS AND OPPRESSED:

A. NO ACCOUNTABILITY: CITIZENS LACK SUFFICIENT ACCESS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE DEALINGS AND PROCESS OF THE JUDICIARY SO ARE UNABLE TO CHANGE MATTERS OR VOTE COMPETENTLY WHERE POSSIBLE WHETHER BY RETENTION OR ELECTION OR BE INVOLVED IN EXECUTIVE APPOINTMENTS; CITIZENS LACK SUFFICIENT ACCESS TO JUDICIAL DEALINGS AND PROCESS TO DETERMINE IF THE OATH OF OFFICE IS BEING COMPLIED WITH BY OFFICERS; LAWMAKING AND EXECUTIVE BRANCHES FAIL TO EXERCISE THEIR CHECKS AND BALANCES AUTHORITY WHEN NECESSARY OUT OF FEAR, IGNORANCE OR POLITICS, IN FACT, THE JUDICIARY WILL EVEN DARE THAT THEY BE CHECKED BY ANOTHER BRANCH, FAR AS THEY ARE CONCERNED THEY ARE THE FINAL WORD OR ACT, RIGHT OR WRONG.  

B. LIMITS ON HOLDING OFFICE: THE BRANCH FUNCTIONS LIKE A CLUB OR SECRET SOCIETY AS ONLY A VERY SMALL GROUP OF CITIZENS(BAR MEMBERS OR PAST JUDGES) CAN QUALIFY FOR THE OFFICES AS CANDIDATES, WHETHER BY ELECTION, RETENTION, OR APPOINTMENT, SUBJECTING THE BRANCH TO CORRUPTION, RACKETEERING AND OTHER MISCONDUCT UNCHECKED PRESENTLY.  THE MAJORITY OF JUDGES EXPECT AND, IN FACT, DO HOLD THE OFFICE FOR LIFE IN ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.

C. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE INEQUITIES: DUE TO THE DOCTRINES OF HARMLESS ERROR, TIPSY COACHMAN, LACK OF TRANSCRIPTS/STATEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS AND PER CURIAM WITHOUT WRITTEN OPINION DECISIONS THE UNCERTAINTY OF ANY CASE DISPOSITION WHETHER ADMINISTRATIVE, CIVIL, OR CRIMINAL IN NATURE BECOMES THE EQUIVALENT OF HIGH STAKES CASINO GAMING. THE SO-CALLED DOCTRINES OF THE RULE OF LAW, STARE DECISIS AND BINDING PRECEDENT HAVE BECOME NO MORE THAN AN ILLUSION AND CONTRADICTION.  SEMINAL/NEW, OR CLARIFYING OF EXISTING, PRECEDENT WHEN NECESSARY IS ON MANY OCCASIONS AVOIDED BY SIMPLY RENDERING A PER CURIAM WITHOUT WRITTEN OPINION AS A DECISION.

                                         
                          ______________________________

        MAY IT BE NOTED AND UNDERSTOOD THAT THE    INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY AS IS STATED OR ADVOCATED, SO GREATLY, BY MANY AMONG THE BAR AND BENCH DOES NOT, CAN NOT IN ANY WAY MEAN NOR IMPLY AN ABSOLUTE HANDS OFF MONITORING OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM. THAT WOULD MEAN THE JUDICIARY WOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE CHECKS AND BALANCES DOCTRINE AND CRIMINAL CONDUCT WHEREAS THE OTHER TWO BRANCHES(LEGISLATIVE/ EXECUTIVE) OF GOVERNMENT CLEARLY ARE.

 HAMPERED AUTHORITY OF 
LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PROSECUTORS

ONE LAST MATTER TO BE OF GREAT CONCERN IS THAT ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER AND PROSECUTOR, BEING CLEARLY WELL TRAINED AND LEARNED IN CRIMINAL CONDUCT, SHOULD NEVER BE LEFT TO FEAR OR MOCKERY FOR APPREHENDING ANY JUDICIAL OFFICER HAVING WITNESSED OR EVIDENCE OF A OFFENSE BY A JUDICIAL OFFICER WHETHER ON OR OFF THE BENCH.  PRESENTLY IT IS THE CUSTOM OUT OF FEAR OR FAVOR THAT SUCH APPREHENDING NEVER OCCUR HENCE THE JUDGES DO WHATEVER THEY PLEASE WITH IMPUNITY, EVEN PRONOUNCING ILLEGAL ORAL ORDERS/RULINGS THAT MUST BE COMPLIED WITH BY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER OR PROSECUTOR LEAST THEY’LL SUFFER CONTEMPT AND INCARCERATION.

THIS MUST END, LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PROSECUTING OFFICERS NEED SOME SORT OF PROTECTION FROM JUDICIAL ABUSE AND MISCONDUCT TO BE ABLE TO FREELY AND COMPETENTLY EXERCISE THEIR POWERS AND DUTIES IN THESE SETTINGS.


 OTHER READINGS

AN ARRAY OF ARTICLES AND ADVOCACY HAVE BEEN DONE IN THE PAST FIFTEEN YEARS TO PROMOTE THE ABSOLUTE INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY. HERE ARE SOME LINKS CONCERNING THE FLORIDA COURTS SYSTEM:





No comments:

Post a Comment